Skip to main content
Log in

Catalytic torrefaction of pelletized agro-residues with Cu/Al2O3 catalysts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of the addition of a Cu/Al2O3 catalyst on the product distribution of gas-phase products during torrefaction of pelletized corn residues was investigated at temperatures between 220 and 300 °C. Pelletized corn residues were mechanically mixed with Cu/Al2O3 catalyst pellets. The mixture was then thermally treated in a fixed bed reactor for 40 min of residence time at low temperatures of wet flue gas simulated by O2 (4% v/v), CO2 (12% v/v), and steam (14% v/v), balanced with N2. The higher heating value (HHV) of torrefied pellets was also examined within the operating conditions. It was found that torrefaction temperature affected the product distribution, yields, and HHV significantly, while the presence of Cu/Al2O3 catalyst pellets promoted the conversion of CO to CO2 and the production of H2 from raw biomass pellets via CO oxidation and water-gas shift reactions. This finding provides a favorable outlook for the energy utilization of pelletized agro-residues via torrefaction with wet flue gas as a pretreatment method, in which inexpensive catalysts could be applied to eliminate toxic gases and/or generate valuable hydrogen during the torrefaction process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Onsree T, Tippayawong N, Zheng A, Li H (2018) Pyrolysis behavior and kinetics of corn residue pellets and eucalyptus wood chips in a macro thermogravimetric analyzer. Case Stud Therm Eng 12:546–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tippayawong N, Rerkkriangkrai P, Aggarangsi P, Pattiya A (2018) Characterization of biochar from pyrolysis of corn residues in a semi-continuous carbonizer. Chem Eng Trans 70:1387–1392

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tokarski S, Głód K, Ściążko M, Zuwała J (2015) Comparative assessment of the energy effects of biomass combustion and co-firing in selected technologies. Energy 92:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Piboon P, Tippayawong N, Wongsiriamnuay T (2017) Densification of corncobs using algae as a binder. Chiang Mai University Journal of Natural Sciences 16(3):175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wongsiriamnuay T, Tippayawong N (2015) Effect of densification parameters on the properties of maize residue pellets. Biosyst Eng 139:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen W-H, Peng J, Bi XT (2015) A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:847–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen W-H, Cheng C-L, Show P-L, Ong HC (2019) Torrefaction performance prediction approached by torrefaction severity factor. Fuel 251:126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng J et al (2015) Effects of thermal treatment on energy density and hardness of torrefied wood pellets. Fuel Process Technol 129:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shang L et al (2012) Quality effects caused by torrefaction of pellets made from Scots pine. Fuel Process Technol 101:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Phanphanich M, Mani S (2011) Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass. Bioresour Technol 102(2):1246–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Onsree T et al (2019) Torrefaction of pelletized corn residues with wet flue gas. Bioresour Technol:285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121330

  12. Li J, Brzdekiewicz A, Yang W, Blasiak W (2012) Co-firing based on biomass torrefaction in a pulverized coal boiler with aim of 100% fuel switching. Appl Energy 99:344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gil MV, García R, Pevida C, Rubiera F (2015) Grindability and combustion behavior of coal and torrefied biomass blends. Bioresour Technol 191:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pal DB, Chand R, Upadhyay SN, Mishra PK (2018) Performance of water gas shift reaction catalysts: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 93:549–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeong D-W et al (2014) Low-temperature water–gas shift reaction over supported Cu catalysts. Renew Energy 65:102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Devard A, Brussino P, Marchesini FA, Ulla MA (2019) Cu(5%)/Al2O3 catalytic performance on the phenol wet oxidation with H2O2: influence of the calcination temperature. J Environ Chem Eng 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103201

  17. Agarwal V, Patel S, Pant KK (2015) H2 production by steam reforming of methanol over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts: transient deactivation kinetics modeling. Appl Catal A Gen 279(1):155–164

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang C et al (2016) The water-gas shift reaction for hydrogen production from coke oven gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst. Catal Today 263:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parikh J, Channiwala SA, Ghosal GK (2005) A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels. Fuel 84(5):487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu Q, Yu T, Chen H, Fang G, Pan X, Bao X (2020) The effect of Al3+ coordination structure on the propane dehydrogenation activity of Pt/Ga/Al2O3 catalysts. J Energy Chem 41:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Q et al (2014) CuO nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, growth mechanisms, fundamental properties, and applications. Prog Mater Sci 60:208–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan M, Memic A (2012) Size-dependent antimicrobial properties of CuO nanoparticles against Gram-positive and -negative bacterial strains. Int J Nanomedicine 7:3527–3535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Amiri TY, Moghaddas J (2015) Cogeled copper–silica aerogel as a catalyst in hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(3):1472–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sittisun P, Tippayawong N, Wattanasiriwech D (2015) Thermal degradation characteristics and kinetics of oxy combustion of corn residues. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/304395

  26. Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) Comparative evaluation of torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of solid biofuel. Energy Convers Manag 105:746–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim D, Lee K, Park KY (2016) Upgrading the characteristics of biochar from cellulose, lignin, and xylan for solid biofuel production from biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. J Ind Eng Chem 42:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stelt MJC, Gerhauser H, Kiel JHA, Ptasinski KJ (2011) Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3748–3762

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen WH, Zhuang Y-Q, Liu S-H, Juang T-T, Tsai C-M (2016) Product characteristics from the torrefaction of oil palm fiber pellets in inert and oxidative atmospheres. Bioresour Technol 199:367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tong S et al (2018) A gas-pressurized torrefaction method for biomass wastes. Energy Convers Manag 173:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen D, Cen K, Cao X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Ma H (2018) Restudy on torrefaction of corn stalk from the point of view of deoxygenation and decarbonization. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 135:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bartocci P, Zampilli M, Bidini G, Fantozzi F (2018) Hydrogen-rich gas production through steam gasification of charcoal pellet. Appl Therm Eng 132:817–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Byron SRJ, Muruganandam L, Shekhar SM (2010) A review of the water gas shift reaction kinetics. Int J Chem React Eng 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.2238

  34. Zhang L, Song H, Xu G, Wang W, Yang L (2019) MOFs derived mesoporous Co3O4 polyhedrons and plates for CO oxidation reaction. J Solid State Chem 276:87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received funding from the Thailand Research Fund via the Research and Researcher for Industry program (Grant No. PHD57I0059), Chiang Mai University, and the South Carolina Smart State Center for Strategic Approaches to the Generation of Electricity (SAGE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochen Lauterbach.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tippayawong, N., Onsree, T., Williams, T. et al. Catalytic torrefaction of pelletized agro-residues with Cu/Al2O3 catalysts. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 11, 1847–1852 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00535-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00535-w

Keywords